The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030
The line chart illustrates the 2008 report about the energy consumption in the USA since 1980 with the prospect after five decades namely untill 2030. There were four energy sources will be figured out which measured in quadrillion units. Overall, as can be seen that the most positive fuel consumption had to be from petrol and oil and tend to be more popular in the future whilst other sources remain comparatively stable.
Regarding to the data, in 1980 initially, the largest energy consumption sourced from petrol and oil which predicted to be get higher after five decades and reach over 45 quadrillion units closely. The next highest consumption had to be in natural gas and coal came third. Nevertheless, both of the sources estimated to get an increment in 2030 rose up to 3-10 quadrillion units bigger approximately.
In additional, the remaining sources such as nuclear, solar/wind, and hydropower had similar number at the beginning which were a little less than 5 quadrillion units. Likewise, those sources tend to maintain the same level likely still around the former number after five decades shown roughly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-21 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-17 | neverlandforestcat | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-10 | brew | 78 | view |
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines 73
- CO2 emissions for different forms of transport in the European Union and the percentage of funds being spent on different form of transport 89
- UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008 78
- The main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 67
- the sales made by a coffee shop in a a office building on a typical weekday 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, third, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14130434783 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72691808286 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619565217391 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.233329965 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.25 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 5.23603664747 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187150756751 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887724404541 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138121851591 0.0843802449381 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123520329049 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109407845639 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.