It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.
'Nature or nurture?' is always a controversy in society about the origin of excellent performancers in different fields, especially in arts and sports. Although people always claim that only some artist or athletes was God gifted to success in their careers, other still aver that if children gain a wise guidance and perfect educational programs in specific fields, they will also be a talented people. Therefore this essay will discuss both viewpoints before giving a personal opinion.
To begin with, only a few people are boring with a talent. A typical instance for this case is Mozart - a Great musician of Europe and the world, who could play a piano when he was only 3 years old. personally, I belive confidently that a child cannot have the skill like that but imitating from earlier generations. For example, if children have parents working in art, they mainly master at musical performance, and find it is easier to play an instrument than others. like Mozart, his father was also a musician.
In my opinion, natural talent is not the major part of being successful. Without practicing intensively and overcoming tough experiences, no one can reach the glamorous goals that they have dreamt of. In addition, sacrifice is needed for you to receive the adequate accomplishment.
In conclusion, in my viewpoint, no one is better than others when they are born. Hence, talent and gifted children are born by the careful nurture and education of good parents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-16 | muna paudel | 73 | view |
- The pie charts below show the causes the diseases in developing and developed countries 30
- the table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in Europe country between 1979 and 2004. 78
- The pie charts below show the causes the diseases in developing and developed countries
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Is
Nature or nurture? is always a controversy in society about t...
^^
Line 1, column 403, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...s, they will also be a talented people. Therefore this essay will discuss both viewpoints...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 469, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...discuss both viewpoints before giving a personal opinion. To begin with, only a few people a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Personally
...y a piano when he was only 3 years old. personally, I belive confidently that a child cann...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Like
...sier to play an instrument than others. like Mozart, his father was also a musician....
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, still, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 5.60731707317 339% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1229.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0368852459 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7743274791 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 106.607317073 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.684426229508 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.0307891557 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7857142857 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4285714286 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 5.23603664747 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 3.70975609756 377% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168901865268 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476833055533 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304508892574 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889129505875 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259333504029 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 40.7170731707 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.