As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Obviously, technology and using of that in order to find solution is one of the most important issues in new era despite this fact that there is controversial question whether using technology is making people lazier than before or not. I am afraid I disagree with this idea that expressing, technology is harmful for human mind. The reasons to substantiate my view point are explored in the following.
To begin with, controlling technology is going to be the main reason for dissuading us to accept that human mind is dramatically hurting during these days. It is crystal clear, technologies such as computers, automatons and printers will not work without controlling human mind. As a result, individuals need to improve his or her potential to deal with new technology and this happening leads to have positive effects on human mentality. As an illustration we can regard a teacher, teaching in a school. Every day, he or she has to deal with some new technology, including printer, computer, etc. If he or she tries to learn how to work with these kinds of technologies and also try to control them, we will not see decreasing in his or her brainpower.
Furthermore, inventing new technology makes innovation and innovation persuade us to admit that technology not only does not debilitate human ability to think but also is tempted them to build new tools. Surely, innovation needs to become better in thinking and usually attempting for achieving goals increase our quality. As a result we would have a lot of people who trying to find new ideas and make our life easy. This is so beneficial and a method that is using in colleges and universities to educate student. For perceive this words, we just need to recall founders of Google who was studying in universities and once they decided to change every one’s life.
Without shadow of doubt, technology has their own problem in concerning with human life. It is true that using cars vastly causing air pollution, and it is reality that humanity is influenced on heating Earth. Nevertheless, we should mention that these days some developed countries are passing new law for restricting bad results of new technology. Paris settlement is the best instance to drive this fact home. Developed countries concentrated about results of heating earth on future environment therefore they decided to decrease their productions that utilize materials which was threatened our natural habitat. With the help of ruling limitation law they could step forward to preserve our globe.
In conclusion, I do believe that technology helps mankind, since the ability of controlling never disappear and this helps brainpower in addition technology has a major role in improving innovation but always we should consider the harmful effects of technology such as heating earth and air pollution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | tarun9927 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | vivek2upad | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 54 | view |
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 58
- The council of Maple County, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limiting 79
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site 3
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible First, atmospheric 3
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Obviously, technology and using of that ...
^^
Line 2, column 754, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ee decreasing in his or her brainpower. Furthermore, inventing new technology ma...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, as to, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, i am afraid, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 33.0505617978 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2377.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 467.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08993576017 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87416584324 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55460385439 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 741.6 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.952740269 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.19047619 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2380952381 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2380952381 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160583078568 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476074263798 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430203156755 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094788998125 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247715668884 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.