Some people think that new technologies benefit the life of workers whereas some deny the statement. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Considering ubiquitously, developments in technologies has improved the quality of work culture, which has uplifted the life of employees, according to some people, while others believe that it actually has degrade the life. In my opinion, technology has really changed the face of workplaces; it is the excessive utilization of it by employers, which has made the life of employees a living hell.
To begin with those who deem that technology has real benefits. In several ways, technological advancement has revolutionized the work practices. Many an employer is concerned about the safety of his workers and therefore installed advanced safety measures, which was often ignored in the past. Moreover, the need to go to office for work is no more dependency because people can work from virtually anywhere by using their own machines. For instance, a pregnant woman can continue her work from home rather than going on maternity leaves. Thus, technology has certainly played a huge rule in betterment of the workers.
Meanwhile, others contradict with this approach and feel that it is also a main reason for degrading the quality of life as whole. When people can work from anywhere, they end up continuously working, which simply has removed the boundary between work and life. In other words, work-life balance is just mirage that we try to chase while working nonstop from everywhere. For instance, the time after the office hour, which people can use to spend with friends and family, is now used to finish pending work. Furthermore, the excessive sitting in front of the screens has detrimental impact on the health, it weaken the eyesight and an invitation to other illnesses in the long run, which is nothing but a curse by technology. In short, technology has turned human in to machines.
In conclusion, although technology has some downside, its role cannot be ignored in making life easy. Thus, people should learn to what extent they want to leverage technology to use it effectively and efficiently.
- The free movement of goods across national borders has long been a controversial issue. Some people argue that it is necessary for economic growth, while others claim that it damages local industries. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- Some people believe that it is a good idea to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views 73
- Some companies sponsor sports as a way to advertise themselves. Some people think it is good, while others think there are disadvantages to this. Discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
- Childcare is important. Some people think that parents should require child training courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime, but some people believe these measures restrict our individual freedom. Do the benefits of increased security outweigh the drawbacks? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Considering ubiquitously, developments in technologies has improve...
^^
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'degraded'.
Suggestion: degraded
...ile others believe that it actually has degrade the life. In my opinion, technology has...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 609, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'weakens'?
Suggestion: weakens
...as detrimental impact on the health, it weaken the eyesight and an invitation to other...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, really, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, in short, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14242424242 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83682494306 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6653372484 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0625 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4375 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144615324689 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507071495701 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406882282513 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107090710963 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474792426811 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.