The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010
The two pie charts compare the percentage of online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in the year 2005 and 2010.
Generally, it is that significant changes shown for all the categories. Electronics & appliance were the most popular among the people on 2005, then food & beverage accoured instead of electronics & appliance in 2010. Food & beverage the worst amount was purchased in 2005, and home furnishing the least amount in 2010.
As we can see, electronics & Appliance were the highest percentage in 2005, but it had decrease to 30% in 2010. The difference case for food & beverage we can see it had increase from 22% in 2005 to 32% in 2010, it was the highest percentage in 2010. While, the home furnishing had decrease from 25% in the first year to 15% in 2010, it was the lowest percentage by 2010. The difference case for the video games which were 18% in 2005 had increase to 23% in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-17 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | fdsugb22 | view | |
| 2023-07-05 | jasmine.27 | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | Maju Chowdhury | 67 | view |
- The pie chart below sho the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 67
- In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting universities studies. 67
- The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. 56
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 750.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71698113208 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59749119618 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496855345912 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.8360323831 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.75 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32206649049 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164891502892 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.207660332799 0.0843802449381 246% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.321456191102 0.15604864568 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.27499541505 0.0819641961636 336% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.