Men and Women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not suitable for equal tasks.
I agree to the statement: Men and Women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not suitable for many tasks.
Women's body is different from a man's body. It has proven to be weaker and therefore, unable to perform all tasks such as men. Nonetheless, women have taken up the challenge to evolve into stronger beings. However, they just fall short as nothing can go against the laws of nature.
The human body is the product of nature. And by nature, A women's body is different to that of men. Men have evolved to become physically stronger, while women are weaker. Therefore, few tasks that men perform are not compatable to a women's body. While the former can perform heavy duty tasks such as: Lifting heavy weights, running faster, etc., the latter, though capable of performing these tasks, are not as efficeint/fast as men. Nevertheless, as we are living in the 21st century, gallons of changes are occuring and so is the changes in the conception in the difference between men and women. Women, though treated as the weaker society, are exponentially raising to the level of men. We believe, women are participating in all fields, just like men. Let's take an example: A few decades ago, if we'd happen to the count the number of women in the Army, we'd have none. However, as of recently, there has been a drastic improvement with over 30% women serving the Army. This shows how women have taken up the challenge to hone their skills and physical requirements to be able to match up to men. However, the fact remains that a women's physical skill falls short of that of men, and cannot perform all tasks that can be performed by men.
Therefore, men and women are not equally suitable for many tasks because of physical contsraints.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 758, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...icipating in all fields, just like men. Lets take an example: A few decades ago, if ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 802, Rule ID: WED_WE_D[1]
Message: Did you mean 'we'd'?
Suggestion: we'd
... take an example: A few decades ago, if wed happen to the count the number of women...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, therefore, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 305.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75409836066 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57998831269 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504918032787 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0544491704 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.5555555556 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9444444444 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419301003417 0.243740707755 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143792252032 0.0831039109588 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173731009286 0.0758088955206 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.3814082282 0.150359130593 254% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.241404527563 0.0667264976115 362% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 14.1392134831 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.