Percentage of students giving good ratings for different aspects of a university
The given table chart illustrates the proportion of students satisfaction for teaching method and facilities in a university serializes from the highest to lowest percent for five categories in 2000, 2005, 2010. In general, it is observed that the use of the majority of these university’s consumables grew over 10 years, print and electronic devices stayed at the biggest group of all resources.
It is evident from the information that print-appliances and resources from electricity made up the highest percent, which exceeded three figures in 2010, accounted for 88 %. For electricity devices, although it witnessed a marginal rate at the beginning still reached the peak afterward. In the other side of the contrary, from 2000 to 2010, group of modules demanded showed the gradual plunge, which was ranged down from 32% to 27% in the terminal year, making it the less popular resource among the list.
On the other hands, educating aspect figure sustained steady rose in a university throughout the years, with the number reaching their crest of 69% in the year of 2010. It is also be noted that over the period, the building facilities experienced a period of stability, which was patterned 77% for 10 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-29 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | view | |
| 2024-11-22 | trpg143 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the lowest'.
Suggestion: to the lowest
... university serializes from the highest to lowest percent for five categories in 2000, 20...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y's consumables grew over 10 years, print and electronic devices stayed at t...
^^
Line 1, column 404, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... at the biggest group of all resources. It is evident from the information that ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...adual plunge, which was ranged down from 32% to 27% in the terminal year, making ...
^^
Line 3, column 509, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he less popular resource among the list. On the other hands, educating aspect fig...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, still, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1959798995 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95052537695 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638190954774 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.2233098999 43.030603864 214% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 172.333333333 112.824112599 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.1666666667 22.9334400587 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145030641634 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709585891619 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449059559865 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0964260625079 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329353867467 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.2329268293 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.