the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transportation.
The given bar graph illustrates the information about students who used various five types of modea for commuting to and from scholl during 1990 and 2010.
Overall, it can be seen that highest number of children prefered walking for their health in a begin given year. While, cycling was less popular among pupils in 2010.
According to graph, in 1990 roughly 4 millions trips were created by car because of many students. The peck number of trips done by children through walking. Which is approximately 12 millions and 6 million trips were done people via cycling. Whereas, 1 percentage less people did sometimes of walking and sometime commute by bus. However, 7 millions bus trips done by students.
11 millions times car went for taking and receiving children. While, walking 3 was created just half from car trip. In middle of 2010, the ration of trips were gradually increased till end. School students were less interested in cycling, which only developed 2 millions trips. On the other hand, just 1 millions more students liked commuting by bus and with walk.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-23 | Nayanapatel | 78 | view |
- Government money should be spent on school for children rather than professional sports and arts.do you agree or disagree? 61
- The table compares the property rent per week in three areas in London and also shows the required salary in London. 67
- In many countries weddings are expensive compared to the past what is cause it is a positive development or negative development 84
- the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transportation. 78
- In many countries weddings expensive compared to the Past what is cause is it positive development or negative 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...en prefered walking for their health in a begin given year. While, cycling was less pop...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: BEING_BEGIN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'being'?
Suggestion: being
... prefered walking for their health in a begin given year. While, cycling was less pop...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put before the verb 'did'.
Suggestion: sometimes did
...ling. Whereas, 1 percentage less people did sometimes of walking and sometime commute by bus....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 63, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...went for taking and receiving children. While, walking 3 was created just half from c...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ration of trips were gradually increased till end. School students were less inte...
^^
Line 7, column 303, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... millions trips. On the other hand, just 1 millions more students liked commuting...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98888888889 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46183209906 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644444444444 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2811330255 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.0769230769 112.824112599 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8461538462 22.9334400587 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53846153846 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181241819939 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678602254721 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475358894108 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110360140793 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0153143159079 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.07 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.