To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
The author of the statement claim that to understand the most important characteristics of society, one must study it major cities. While some may argue that this statement holds true all the time, others may counter that claim by providing examples in support of their claim. In my essay, I will highlight both sides of the argument, and also provide sound reasoning for my claim.
Major cities are the backbone of a Country as they contribute majorly in the economy of a country, employing a large number of people, represent their country at the international level, etc. They are the dream cities for many not only across the country but across the globe because you will get much more as one could get in their city. But because of the urbanization and development in these cities, they start losing the important characteristic of a society. So by studying the major cities one would not get the important characteristic of a society.
For decades countries are divided into two fragments: rural and urban. In urban you will see the urbanization and development. But in rural, you will find the cultural heritage of a country and the bucolic beauty of a society, which we won't find in the urban area because of urbanization and development. For example, in a country like India if you want to understand the important characteristics of society from its major cities like New Delhi, Mumbai or Bangalore, you won't get the enough information about the culture of India, to know the culture you have to study cities Like Varanasi, Ahyodha, etc, where one will get the amply information about the culture and heritage of a society.
In a nutshell, we can say that the major cities will not provide the clear picture of the characteristic of a society, to understand the culture and heritage of a society one must study the rural area of a country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | snowsss | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | snowsss | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | nikhil40507 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 66
- the government must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive. 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problem, the ability of humans to thing bout themselve will surely deteriorates. 50
- major cities 54
- Technology 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'majors'?
Suggestion: majors
...teristics of society, one must study it major cities. While some may argue that this ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... in the economy of a country, employing a large number of people, represent their country at the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...he globe because you will get much more as one could get in their city. But becaus...
^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heritage of a society. In a nutshell, we can say that the major cities will no...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 19.5258426966 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 319.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8275862069 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81115550919 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 215.323595506 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460815047022 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 499.5 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.7486318296 60.3974514979 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.333333333 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5833333333 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.21951772744 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357866664757 0.243740707755 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163558237891 0.0831039109588 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.213178931739 0.0758088955206 281% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235758761316 0.150359130593 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630325557128 0.0667264976115 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 100.480337079 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.