The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and present.
The development of seaside village between 1995 and present is shown in the map. It can be seen that the business sector showed noticeable improvement, and there were some change in housing, public facilities, and transportation along the period.
In north east side, the former farmland was shifted into golf field, and there was an extra car park as the part of the hotel in south east side. Moving to south west, some alteration in business can be seen in the shop and fish market. While shop turned into restaurant, fish market has been changed to apartments.
More houses has been built in housing area where in northwest, and the new road was also added around the housing area. The former forest park next to the old farmland has been altered into two tennis courts. In 1995, there was a fishing port in front of fish market, but today it has been demolished.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | Sagar Gurung | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Sagar Gurung | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Sagar Gurung | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Sagar Gurung | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Sagar Gurung | 11 | view |
- it is better for college students to live in schools than live at home with their parents.Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Nowadays many people have access to computers on a wide basis and a large number of children play computer games. What are the positive and negative impacts of playing computer games and what can be done to minimize the bad effects? 73
- FRUUT 11
- Line Graph 84
- People now have the freedom to work and live anywhere in the world due to the development of communication technology and transportation.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 722.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71895424837 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38272722702 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627450980392 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4073901379 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.25 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148835460129 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999965379301 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.229944323272 0.0843802449381 273% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138702132986 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.179931778835 0.0819641961636 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.