The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
The first chart gives information about the energy is used in an average Australian household while the second chart illustrates household greenhouse gas emissions which resulted from this energy use. There were six electronic categories will be figured out and measured in percentage. Overall, as can be seen that the largest usage of household energy had to be in heating machine obviously whilst the highest greenhouse gas discharges was from water heating usage.
Regarding to the first chart, heating machine happened to be the most positive movement energy use which stood at 42% clearly. The next highest trend occured to be in water heating which noted at 30%. In additional, other appliances energy use marked at 15% whereas the energy usage of refrigeration was around a half of the former. Reversely, there were minor energy uses remained specifically refrigeration, lighting, and cooling which only got under 10% approximately.
Looking at the second chart, the largest greenhouse discharges had to be in water heating usage which counted at 32% exactly. Then other appliances use was the next largest emissions which obtained at 28%. Contrastingly, the remaining gas discharges which those are heating, refrigeration, lighting, and cooling happened to be around 3-15%, thoroughly the cooling usage seems as the lowest trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | RAYHAN MAHMUD | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | CharanpreetSingh | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | CharanpreetSingh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | sana_em | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | AlisherBabajonov | 73 | view |
- The figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980 67
- Housing and accommodation has become a major problem in many countries around the world What are some of the main factors that have contributed to this problem What can be done to help reducing the number of homeless people 84
- US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996. 78
- The main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 67
- GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'appliances'' or 'appliance's'?
Suggestion: appliances'; appliance's
...hich noted at 30%. In additional, other appliances energy use marked at 15% whereas the en...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, regarding, second, then, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43062200957 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87525971467 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540669856459 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5940362894 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377186958479 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161080507077 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.188192799656 0.0843802449381 223% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281026918702 0.15604864568 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136438502533 0.0819641961636 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.