Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the Western countries. According to you what solutions can be proposed by the government and individuals?
The effect of the increase of xenophobia in western countries, which was always
debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial change in immigrants
who travel to other countries has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of
this trend on the accelerated increase of xenophobia in western societies in recent
years. It can be agreed that xenophobia has negative impacts, but some people claim
that it has some solutions also. This essay will elaborate how xenophobia has
increased and its solutions and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why the xenophobia rate has accelerated
dramatically in western communities, but the most conspicuous stems from the fact
that there is a large of number of people immigrating around the world to developed
countries, as a result the locals start feeling discomfort because immigrants do not
share their same customs. For instance, in the las decades African refugees have
been suffering from discrimination and isolation due to their beliefs. xenophobia,
therefore, can play a vital role for locals who dislike immigrant’s traditions.
Approaches to deal with problems of increasing xenophobia are numerous, but the
most effective one is that government should promote tolerance and acceptance
campaigns to eradicate xenophobia incidents, which is not impracticable and
unattainable but comprehensible and feasible. As an illustration, governments should
encourage people to gather and share their culture and experiences as one
community. local governments, hence, can play a vital role for reducing hostility and
violence among locals and foreigners.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the
impact of xenophobia in western countries is prominent, although there are some
solutions that should be well handled.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-25 | richierich25 | 88 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | Roshanip | 55 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-09-17 | maniram vicky | 75 | view |
| 2019-07-26 | Daniel Torres | 77 | view |
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 77
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss pros and cons of this change. Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience 11
- It is argued that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a good choice 88
- In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting? 77
- people emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new roads for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 28, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...eople claim that it has some solutions also. This essay will elaborate how xenophob...
^^^^
Line 16, column 72, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Xenophobia
...ion and isolation due to their beliefs. xenophobia, therefore, can play a vital role for ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 26, column 12, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Local
...ture and experiences as one community. local governments, hence, can play a vital ro...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79078014184 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18092222222 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.3057691629 50.4703680194 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.454545455 104.977214359 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.9669160288 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 24.0 4.12807881773 581% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267266829601 0.242375264174 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961853807905 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663162629575 0.071462118173 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0669283463434 0.151781067708 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568252159684 0.0609392437508 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 12.6369458128 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.