At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.
Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, many countries are facing the rejuvenation of population problem. Although older people’s experience is valuable asset to society, young adults are the future of countries.
Young people are more creatively and more efficiently in problem-solving aspect and they can provide well-educated workforce for countries. Generally young adults are more energetic and powerful, meanwhile they have more time and abilities to serve their countries and build a prosperous society. For example, when people are facing serious problems, young people’s ability of innovate is often more effective with less effort. Compared with older people, sometimes their conservative attitude toward to problem is not a good way to overcome difficult. In addition, some manufacturing sectors also need considerable number of young workers to meeting the growing demand.
On the other hand, rejuvenation of population can reduce government’s pressure on health care spending. It is widely known that most medical needs and costs are occur in the last years of life. If there were more young people in countries, government could spend more money on more infrastructures and bring tangible benefits to public.
Nevertheless, it is true that older people’s experience and wisdom are a valuable asset to countries. They can work as consultants and impart their knowledge and skills to the younger generation. For example, some senior managers can teach young people how to manage a company, and how to provide better services for public.
In conclusion, young people can provide a better quality labor force for countries and promote social development, although old people are also helpful to countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-24 | Sushmabenarji | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | julieehung | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | happyhappy | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | enassar | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | WAFA | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 67
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Other say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language. Discuss both these views and give your o 56
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Other say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language. Discuss both these views and give your o 61
- In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have positive or negative effects on society? 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'occurred'.
Suggestion: occurred
...n that most medical needs and costs are occur in the last years of life. If there wer...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, nevertheless, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6511627907 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0904187515 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56976744186 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.8012507914 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.142857143 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134205889367 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509117912212 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379297737015 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0748603339618 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449444570022 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.