Some people claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled. The say that the only way to increase recycle is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Nowadays, using of unrecyclable materials is increasing and the amount of garbage is not gone back to resumption cycle is growing up too. Some people believe that these kinds of issue will be solved by strong punishment by administers. They can set the crucial rule for citizen who do not try to change their habit, while others think differently. In their opinion, law is not the only way that government can against tackle this problem. Legal requirements could be used after showing some solutions. This essay will shed some lights on this argument from both sides, and extend my partial support to the latter view before arriving at conclusion.
Setting statute and putting hard pressure on the people cause that they recycle their domestic rubbish because of fear of severe penalty. It means that for breaking a rule or law they have to pay money. Moreover, putting heavy tax on company which produce materials are not reused can be a good effect on increasing reprocess homes refuse. They can use kind of substance that they need less time to be absorbed to the nature or they are changed to first-hand materials easily. Besides, setting rule for big and small supermarkets that compel them to use renewable packages for their product or advertisement is one of the best solution for these problems, since the large usage of supermarkets goods is related to domestic’s consumptions, so it can be the best answer for it.
On the other hand, some people in society think that punishment or fine sometime has reverse effects on people. Encouraging or paying reward to someone who produces more recycle from their waste can be the best way to teach people. Because of that other civilization try to be a good citizen and also shows their responsibility with nature to receive retribution. In addition, for protecting earth and environment from garbage, advertising is one of the didactic ways. TV or billboards advertising could improve people’s awareness from dangers of unrenewable material. Giving facility before enforcing laws is another way to face with these problems. Government can build some recycle stations near residential complex for helping them to separate their dry, wet, plastic, glass or any other rubbish. I mean that, recycling can start from individual’s home.
At the conclusion, experience shows that finding logical and motive solution always is better than punishment or fine. Generally, humans can accept better everything in tranquility and reject compulsory things.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-28 | Amir Nazaripoor | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | Amir Nazaripoor | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-27 | Amir Nazaripoor | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-27 | Amir Nazaripoor | 78 | view |
- Last Tuesday you flew from New York to Paris When you arrived home you discovered that you had left your cabin bag on the plane Write a letter to the airline Where and when you lost your bag What your bag looks like What it is contents were 87
- People sleep less than before in many countries. Why do people sleep less? What effect does it have on an individually and society? 67
- Economic growth is the only way to end world poverty. However, some people says it leads to environment damage and should be stopped.To what extend do you agree? 87
- Your office building doesn’t have parking available.Write a letter to the manager. In your letter-Explain the problem-Suggest a solution-Say why parking will benefit all employees 73
- Eating too much sugar is harmful for our health. Some people think that it is government responsibility to limit people’s sugar consumption, while others think that it is an individual’s responsibility to limit the amount of sugar they eat.Discuss bot 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, moreover, so, while, i mean, in addition, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2114.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 407.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1941031941 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84400767336 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587223587224 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0962311109 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.666666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.380952381 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234639357171 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678743874686 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472144871506 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126527754247 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0877545965576 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.