The bar chart shows the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in four different countries in 2001.
The nar diagram illustrates number of hours spent in teaching in different schools in Japan, Spain, Iceland, and the USA in 2001.
From the chart, we can observe that in the USA, the primary, secondary, and upper secondary teachers spent more hours in teaching compared to the other three countries. Another observation that can be extracted from the diagram is that upper secondary teachers teachers more hours than the primary and lower secondary teachers in all the four countries. The lowest number of hours spent by primary and lower secondary teachers is an Iceland, while that of upper secondary is in Japan.
The general trait which can be noticed in the given data is, primary level teachers spend less time in teaching than lower secondary teachers, and the upper secondary teacher spent more hours than the remaining categories.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-24 | kaka singh | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | eppa akhil | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-12 | Adithya999 | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-30 | Sreeveni Das | 56 | view |
| 2019-03-13 | LY | 67 | view |
- Solar energy is becoming more and more popular as a source of household energy in many countries around the world. Why is this? What are the advantages and disadvantages of solar energy? 78
- The 21st century has begun. What changes do you think this new century will bring? 56
- Percentage of people using multiple social networking sites 73
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- A gift (such as a camera, a soccer ball, or an animal) can contribute to a child's development. What gift would you give to help a child to develop? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: teachers
...rom the diagram is that upper secondary teachers teachers more hours than the primary and lower s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 708.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 138.0 196.424390244 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13043478261 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.42743929552 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47491086404 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 66.0 106.607317073 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478260869565 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 212.4 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.00628515 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.6 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279714931106 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182110131851 0.103423049105 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897900427951 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222255289834 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101517325789 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.