“To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.”
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
A society consists of different types of individuals such that each individual has different tastes, life-styles and beliefs. Therefore, the society is being resembled to a puzzle and it is said that, ‘to understand the puzzle as a whole you should be aware of each component of this puzzle’. It may be a good idea to study its major cities to understand the most important characteristics of a society. However one may also analyse the society by not focusing on major cities but by concentrating also on the rest of the cities/other particular regions/ minor cities local.
The major cities of a society include a lot of the characteristics of this society. Since major cities provide people more opportunities to work under better conditions, people from the different parts of the society choose to come to these cities and they want to reside in these cities in order to access better life conditions. So, the major cities give us important clues about the society’s characteristics. We can think of these cities as a miniature of the big society.
Even though it sounds logical that one must study the major cities to be able to understand the major characteristics of the society, omitting the analysis of the local and just focusing on the major cities is not adequate to infer the features of the society. The people who migrate to the big cities change their life styles dramatically and they start to maintain a life as if they have been the residents of these cities right from the beginning. However, the people who still live in the particular non-major parts of the society by not choosing to migrate to the big cities indicates completely different characteristics that are indigenous to this particular area. So that is why the people who are living in the non-major cities, that is the local people of those cities who have not migrated, are the real indicators of the characteristics of those specific cities. That is why it will not be enough to study the major cities to capture the main characteristics of the society.
To conclude, understanding the main characteristics of the society is a complicated task. It will be a good idea to study the major cities because one can find a lot of things that reflects the characteristics of the society but it will never be enough to capture it all by just analysing the major cities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-31 | kartal | 50 | view |
| 2019-04-11 | younghyopark | 66 | view |
- topic: shortening the employees workweek to 4 days instead of five days 83
- 27-)“The best way to teach — whether as an educator, employer, or parent — is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.”Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and su 50
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 73
- shortening workweek 73
- 35-)“Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.”Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and ex 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 562, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the society by not choosing to migrate to the big cities indicates completely d...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 12.9106741573 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1972.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 404.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88118811881 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03167100223 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.403465346535 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 642.6 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.720402493 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.466666667 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9333333333 23.4991977007 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26666666667 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163843850493 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757015248426 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060439350386 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114318313742 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354137987815 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.