Some people believe that students should be allowed to evaluate and criticise their teachers to improve the quality of education. Others think this is disrespectful to teachers. Discuss both views, give your opinion and include relevant examples.
Introduction: It is an irrefutable issue that teaching sphere is experiencing deterioration. Whilst some people offer to encourage students to express their opinions in terms of teaching styles so as to improve the education system, others consider that it may conduce to serious problems in the classroom. Personally, i deem that the viewpoint of the former group might help our education to thrive, but it should be accomplished carefully without disheartening teachers
Body: To begin with, several problems would evolve if pupils tell what they think about lessons among their counterparts. First of all, it is a nonsense to give students a chance to asses their teachers, as their experience as well as education are not in high level yet. Moreover, if all students simultaneously evaluated their teachers and said their thoughts in the classroom it would culminate in chaos. Eventually, there would not be any appropriate atmosphere to acquire knowledge due to noise and lack of respect along with discipline.
Body: However, it is completely wrong to neglect students' opinions because without criticism there would not be any development. Primarily, students can write anonymous feedback on paper after the lessons or one can approach their teachers and have a face-to-face conversation which should remain only between them. In this case, teachers may understand and accept their fault in order to improve themselves afterwards. Another suggestion, meanwhile, can be training and it ought to be funded by governments. During the training professors can teach their less accomplished colleagues the best and the most efficient ways to conduct lessons
Conclusion: In conclusion, students should be allowed to criticize their teachers but only in person and after thinking rationally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-31 | shozruxatashev | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-31 | shozruxatashev | 78 | view |
| 2018-05-13 | wtyqm | 56 | view |
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since digital technology is now replacing their function To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life What are those problems Should the government encourage people to move to regional towns 73
- Increasing travels between countries enable people to learn different cultures or to increase tension between people from different countries? 78
- We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help, so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries. 78
- Levels of youth crime are increasing rapidly in most cities around the world What are the reasons for this and suggest some solutions 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ir opinions in terms of teaching styles so as to improve the education system, others co...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 320, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... problems in the classroom. Personally, i deem that the viewpoint of the former g...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, as to, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50541516245 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04638385417 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613718411552 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.2386591265 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.636363636 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1818181818 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7272727273 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268891275526 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953071270253 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501523400512 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164438614159 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217447098624 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.