Smocking should be banned in all public places. Do you agree or disagree with their statement?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in drug addiction banned in the present scenario. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that contain nicotine which causes cancer and lung diseases can not only contribute to passive smoker can develop cancer of lung and mouth but can also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only when one follows such a system, can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibility, dedication and perseverance. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of smoking should be banned in all public places.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of smoking should be banned in all public places are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-02 | jashan randhawa | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | jashan randhawa | 80 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | jashan randhawa | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | lovepreetdhillon | 80 | view |
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? Discuss with appropriate examples. 77
- Should sports classes be sacrificed in high school, so student can concentrate on academic subjects? 80
- Polygamy has increased widely in recent years. What solutions can you brought forward to declare this issue? 85
- Because of the global economy, many goods including what we use daily produced by other countries have to be transported for a long distance. To what extent do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 55
- Smocking should be banned in all public places. Do you agree or disagree with their statement? 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87937743191 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74399359058 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571984435798 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0004591349 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 7.25397266985 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168796498717 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681381419964 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909104560028 0.071462118173 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113103126142 0.151781067708 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592134562574 0.0609392437508 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.