All parents want the best opportunities for their children. There are some people who think that schools should teach children skill but other thin having a range of subjects is better for a children’s future. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
Parents leave no stones unturned to find the best for their kids. While a group believes that acquiring versatility is important for children, others emphasize on book-based knowledge for future potential. I tend to think that the adaptation of practical skills is imperative for a child's positive prospects.
On the one hand, schools should actively focus on building expertise rather than delivering lectures only. This will not only help kids to develop multiple intelligence but also will pave a smooth way to the bright future. Furthermore, all subjects should include more skill-based educational process than lecture-based class. All major subjects like Science, Information Communication Technology (ICT), Physics, Chemistry, Biology etc can take the assistance of laboratories and computers to give hands-on knowledge to the students. As a result, it will engage all the senses of a kid to learn and progress further.
On the other hand, having a wide range of subjects focuses on memorization power of a student unlike the first one. Some subjects like history, literature etc need to have more classroom centered educational environment but these are less in numbers. Most of the other school works might include the creativity to enhance empirical learning. However, more subject-based education can only load the bag of a kid not the brain.
In my opinion, there is no best option than switching towards skill-based education for a child's fast mental growth. students are more likely to learn something practical by seeing and touching than listening only. focusing more on book-based knowledge makes learning process monotonous. So, to bring more colors and moods to bring out the creativity within a kids hands-on learning should be a better choice to stay in line in the world on the competition.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-06 | tazlina | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | dilipkarki | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | dilipkarki | 73 | view |
- In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and I 56
- All parents want the best opportunities for their children. There are some people who think that schools should teach children skill but other thin having a range of subjects is better for a children’s future. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rative for a childs positive prospects. On the one hand, schools should actively...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 616, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of a kid to learn and progress further. On the other hand, having a wide range o...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 118, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Students
...cation for a childs fast mental growth. students are more likely to learn something prac...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Focusing
...eeing and touching than listening only. focusing more on book-based knowledge makes lear...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 359, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a kid' or simply 'kids'?
Suggestion: a kid; kids
...oods to bring out the creativity within a kids hands-on learning should be a better ch...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, so, while, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34843205575 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92664675057 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623693379791 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8532638357 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9375 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22102331234 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658899356854 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502708728335 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132620951442 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07102098747 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.