The charts show (Chart a) the average speed of urban zone traffic (in kilometers per hour or kph) in a number of countries over a fifty-year period, including a future estimate; and also (Chart b) the total number of urban zones per country (in thousands.)
The given charts evince information with respect to the medium velocity of municipal traffic and urban zone numbers throughout half a century, with a foretelling for the future, in nine miscellaneous countries.
For chart a, we can see the most prevailing pattern is for speed to climax consistently with year. The average speed spikes in 1990 in France and USA from the year 1970 towards 2010, expecting to be reduced (around 10 figures) to 52 and 43 respectively in 2020. In Russia, UK and Canada, this number modestly climbs by 2010, before experiencing nearly abrupt slump (approximately 10 numbers) in 2020. This mean value mildly surges by 2020 in Italy, Brazil and Spain respectively 58, 57 and 61. It goes through a V-pattern from 51 in 1970 to 52 in 2010, estimating to be decline in 2020 in Chile.
Turning to urban zone numbers, it is forecast that more than quadruples to 9.3, 128.2, 5.1, 12.4, 11,8, 8.5,9.9 and 5.4 respectively, in France, USA, Italy, Brazil, UK, Spain, Canada and Chile in 2020. By contrast, a reverse trend is prognosticated towards 2020 in Russia.
To recapitulate briefly, it appears by augmenting urban zones(except in Russia), the average speed will slightly tail off in France, USA, UK, Canada and Chile. Albeit, for the rest of countries, increasing the number of urban zones leads to growing the mean velocity.
- In many countries women and men are working full time. It is therefore, logical for women and men to share household works. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby To what extent do you think this is a positive trend 84
- Some say that people working in different job roles should get different amounts of holiday time. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and examples from your own experience. 100
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected personal relationships Has this become a positive or negative development 84
- The Graph shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 11, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'a'?
...e miscellaneous countries. For chart a, we can see the most prevailing pattern ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97356828194 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80201145927 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607929515419 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.212387683 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.9 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185146131584 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703398209768 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586732113498 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120833672635 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481405593386 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.