The charts give information about the amount of exports (millions of tonnes) moving through Rotterdam port in Holland to various global destinations in 2002 and 2012; and also the % rates of tax imposed on these exports by the receiving countries
The given charts evince information with respect to the tonnage of exports from Rotterdam to miscellaneous destinations, and the percentage of tax rate for goods by receiving countries in 2002 and 2012.
As far as the amount of exports is concerned, it mildly tailed off (300 millions of tons) to 3900 and 1500 respectively in USA and Latin America in 2012, declining 500 and 100 millions of tons from 6900 and 2400 respectively in Europe and China in 2002. By contrast, this figure more than tripled from 800 and 700 respectively in Asia-Pacific and Australasia in 2002. This number for the other destination was the same in this two years. Generally, the total amount of exports grew more than 1500 tons from 2002 to 2012.
Turning to tax percent imposed by destinations, this marginally dipped to 2% in USA (downright dropping 1%), while considerably dwindling from 5% and 4% respectively in Asia-Pacific and Australasia (shrinking exactly 3%). This figure surged from 5%,0% and 1% to 8%, 2% and 2% respectively in Europe, China and Latin America. In the other countries, no change did impose.
To recapitulate briefly, it can be seen there is reverse relationship between the percentage of tax and weight of exports. By augmenting levy, the number of experts slumped. whilst by plumping levy, the amount of goods markedly soared (except USA, which slid down).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-16 | tiendung00001 | 11 | view |
| 2020-06-16 | tiendung00001 | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-06 | ata | 92 | view |
| 2018-02-21 | Bilegsaikhan | 87 | view |
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant has been deleted 73
- The graph shows the monthly expenditure on three types of restaurant food in Australia The plot shows the annual number of restaurant visits for the same types of food between 1965 and 2015 100
- Some people believe that a government's responsibility should provide care and financial support for people after they retire other say individuals should save during their working year to fund their own retirement. Do you agree or disagree, and what is y 80
- Nowadays culture is much the same all around the world when compared to previous times. Do you think this is a positive or a negative development? 89
- It is sometimes said that the countryside offers a high quality of life especially for families What are the arguments for and against families choosing to live and work in the countryside for example as farmers What is your own view about this 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '300 million'.
Suggestion: 300 million
...orts is concerned, it mildly tailed off 300 millions of tons to 3900 and 1500 respectively in U...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '100 million'.
Suggestion: 100 million
...atin America in 2012, declining 500 and 100 millions of tons from 6900 and 2400 respectively in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...3%. This figure surged from 5%,0% and 1% to 8%, 2% and 2% respectively in Europe,...
^^
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whilst
...ng levy, the number of experts slumped. whilst by plumping levy, the amount of goods m...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, if, so, while, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1138.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01321585903 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93441014028 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555066079295 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.8233145833 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.454545455 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54545454545 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196952773646 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677566458731 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888456994066 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12849676287 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109289890064 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.