Some people feel that boarding schools (where students or pupils live at the school during the term) are an excellent option for children, while other people disagree for a number of reasons. Consider both sides of this debate and reach a conclusion.
By augmentation societies, there is no reservation that education is an integral part of living, probably boosting the life level of educated person. Although this brings to some polemical issues such as boarding school. Some are of the opinion that this kind of school has lots of benefits for young people, whilst other believe this causes some deleterious problems. Both aspects will be discussed.
On the one hand, those who are proponents of the boarding school give some reasons in light with that. To begin with, youngsters are at the formative years, needing to be learnt independent living. Education in boarding school brings about children to pick up independence, not only by help of cadre of education but also by their classmates. Moreover, these schools tend to climax of camaraderie sense among student, leading to improvement in team works. To clarify this point, the research conducted by Johns Hopkins university in one of this school downright corroborates escalation of throughput of group work.
By contrast, opponents of this view point out some reasons against these sort of schools, where student are coerced to spend virtually whole of the year. First of all, teenagers are at the impressionable states, severely effecting by peripheral areas. If a student is delinquent, with high probable they will unfortunately impart their information to other students. Therefore, the number of juvenile delinquencies will enhance, as this is substantiated with a survey done by Michigan university for about 60 boarding schools. Furthermore, living with other students likely climbs peer pressure, causing irreparable damages in future from perspective of cognitive behavior.
To recapitulate briefly, growing in such schools have own specific benefits, namely synergistic effect in group work, which booms work’s result, and learning to live independent. Albeit it has some pernicious and fundamental efficacy in student’s lifestyle such as learning criminal activities, and peer pressure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | angellica | 89 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Askar2003 | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | ahmadrava88 | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | Mohamad Alen Aliansyah | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | wardiati | 61 | view |
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 78
- Many people support use of animals for testing medicines for humans. Others believe it isn’t appropriate to use animals for such experiments. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 100
- The first graph shows the reasons for studying in the UK by age, while the second graph shows the support given by employers for training by age. 100
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...e discussed. On the one hand, those who are proponents of the boarding school give ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this sort' or 'these nulls'?
Suggestion: this sort; these nulls
...his view point out some reasons against these sort of schools, where student are coerced t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, kind of, sort of, such as, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58441558442 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01862856295 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659090909091 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8118285064 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255733921509 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757919340098 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470877698997 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14458124619 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502898826635 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.