The diagrams below give information about internet use in different world regions of the world
The diagrams illustrate how the Internet was used in various world regions in 2014. The pie chart show how internet usage was divided across populations and the bar chart indicates what reason the Internet was accessed.
From the pie chart we see that 44.8 percent, the vast majority of internet users were located in the Asian continent. We can also see that European users have represented about half this percentage at 22.1 percent, followed by North Americans at 12 percent. Internet users in Oceanic/Australia and the Middle East only account for 1.1 percent and 3.4 percent respectively.
The bar chart tells us the main reasons for using the internet in 2014 was instant messaging. We also can understand that just over 50 percent of users watched online videos, while the same number of users at 40 percent listened to music and also spent time in social networking sites. In summary, we observe the greatest usage of the internet occurred in Asia, and that instant messaging was also its primary function.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-07 | nguyenthao2806 | 47 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of school-leavers entering higher education (ie, colleges and universities), and graduate earnings 1 year after graduation 67
- The bar charts below show how often people in three age groups did various different evening activities in 1980 and 2010 79
- Some say that young and energetic employees are the most valuable for the company, others argue that older employees have more experience and knowledge. 56
- The table below describes percentages of home schooled students in SomeCountry in 1999-2004. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown. 11
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98235294118 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60622756975 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9957154297 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.875 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142072034576 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820316733291 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110418177217 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106972197626 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796528556135 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.