The line graph shows the percentage of Internet users in three countries from 1999 to 2009.
The line graph illustrates the comparison of the percentage of internet users between United States, canada, as well as mexico for a decade, from 1999 to 2009.
Overall, during 1999 to 2009 the percentage of internet users in three countries gravitate to escalate significantly. In 1999 to 2000, United States was positioned as the highest of internet user percentage. However, since 2003 to 2009 that first position was changed by canada. On the other hand, for a decade mexico is the lowest internet user percentage than the others.
Furthermore, during 2003 to 2005 the number of internet user in canada tend to increase slightly, albeit from 2005 to 2009 it gravitate to increase sharply. In contrast, even though since 2005 to 2009 the number of internet user in United States gravitate to boost expand too, albeit it just changed steadily. In term of mexico, the number of internet user boosted significantly since 2001 to 2005, albeit from 2005 to 2009 it increased slowly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-12 | fachryadul92 | 73 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the estimated sales of jeans for two companies next year in Turkey. The pie chart shows the projected market share of the two companies in jeans at the end of next year. 67
- The pie chart and table are showing the causes of the worldwide land degradation and degradation by regions during 1990s. 56
- Nowadays many business meetings and training are happening online and not in real offices. Do you think advantages outweigh the disadvantages in this matter? 73
- The graph gives information about Dubai Gold Sales in 2002Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'gravitates'?
Suggestion: gravitates
...e slightly, albeit from 2005 to 2009 it gravitate to increase sharply. In contrast, even ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, so, well, in contrast, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05521472393 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66883153246 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503067484663 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9528461174 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.625 5.23603664747 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431256786601 0.215688989381 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.208340149945 0.103423049105 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129823619791 0.0843802449381 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.320809519837 0.15604864568 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0979320980127 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.