The time people devote in job leaves very little time for personal life. How widespread is the problem? What problem will this shortage of time cause?
The phenomenon of the time people devote in job leaves very little time for personal life, which was always debatable, now has become more controversial. The substantial influence of time allocation of work and life has sparked the controversy of the potential impact of this trend on the whole society in recent years. It can be agreed that this phenomenon is very widespread, and it will cause some problems. This essay will elaborate on how an unbalanced time distributing is prevalent in the IT industry and how it causes a higher divorce rate, and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerable reasons why unbalanced time distribution between people’s work and their personal life is common, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that it is prevalent in the IT industry. As an illustration, the research has invariably revealed that there are 76% of the United States’ IT programmer saying that they can’t cope with their work and family at the same time due to the high workload. Therefore, people’s time distribution problem is prevalent in the IT industry.
Nevertheless, some people tend to believe that the shortage of time will cause some serious problems as there are innumerable reasons but the most salient one is the high divorce rate. For instance, the statistical report has completely undertaken that the divorce rate of the United Kingdom has a dramatically increase four times compared with 2017 after the shortage of time has become a widespread problem in most of the families. Thus, the lack of time causes a higher divorce rate.
In conclusion, from what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of the shortage of time is prominent, although the higher divorce rate should be well handled.
- The medical technology is responsible for increasing the average life expectancy Do you think it is a curse or a blessing 93
- There are more and more situations using credit cards instead of cash It seems that cashless society is becoming a reality How realistic do you think it is And do you think it brings benefits or problems 84
- As sites expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or expe 62
- As sites expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or expe 77
- Some universities deduct students work if assignment is given late What is your opinion and suggest some alternative actions 48
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aves very little time for personal life, which was always debatable, now has beco...
^^
Line 1, column 499, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...anced time distributing is prevalent in the IT industry and how it causes a higher div...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...s from the fact that it is prevalent in the IT industry. As an illustration, the resea...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 516, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...me distribution problem is prevalent in the IT industry. Nevertheless, some people ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
... divorce rate of the United Kingdom has a dramatically increase four times compared with 2017 after the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10437710438 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92787999516 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501683501684 0.580463131201 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 479.7 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.0942785467 50.4703680194 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.818181818 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27272727273 7.25397266985 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.510156032861 0.242375264174 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196091513479 0.0925447433944 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940362799268 0.071462118173 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27463770539 0.151781067708 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139302363669 0.0609392437508 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.1260098522 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.