The charts shows air pollution levels by different causes among four countries in 2012.
The bar charts compares how many levels of air contamination were attributed to three main reasons in four different nations in the year 2002.
Overall, industry and tram had the biggest negative influence on the environment while electricity generation was recorded causing the least air pollution. In addition, China was seen as a country which exhausts the highest level of pollutant gas to the atmosphere.
A glance at the chart provided reveals that in China, the rate of air pollution caused by industry took the lead, at 80 PPM, which was 10 PPM higher than that of tram, and the last position belonged to electricity generation, at 59 PPM. In America, the level of air contamination was observed a slight difference. The highest rank to emitting gas to air was tram, at 58PPM while that of electricity generation and fume from industry accounted for a similar level, roughly at 30 PPM.
Look the the data for more detail, it is obvious that industry continued to be considered as the main cause of air pollution in Japan, at 43 PPM, electricity generation and tram exhaust less gas than that of industry, at 30 PPM and 16 PPM, respectively. The striking feature was in Australia with all level of contamination by three causes reaching approximately 18-19 PPM.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-10 | Thang Tran | 82 | view |
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car. 73
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata. 61
- The pie charts below give data on the spending and consumption of resources by countries of the world and how the population is distributed. 11
- “Crime is a big problem in the world; many believe that nothing can be done to prevent it. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion.” 84
- The chart below gives information about the UK s ageing population in 1985 and makes predictions for 2035 47
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'compare'.
Suggestion: compare
The bar charts compares how many levels of air contamination we...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 6, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...imilar level, roughly at 30 PPM. Look the the data for more detail, it is obvious tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 6, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...imilar level, roughly at 30 PPM. Look the the data for more detail, it is obvious tha...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, while, as to, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92558139535 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89933507231 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562790697674 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1352561909 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.375 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224345355198 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113475282993 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478405307346 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15648622146 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411382764855 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.