Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.
In recent decades, the question of whether government should take responsibility for environmental protection or not has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although the impact of government and large-scale enterprises in this situation is not without important, individuals’ contribution to improve the environment should not be underestimated.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that impacts of government and companies on the environmental issues is significant. First, since government can enact rules and principles, residents are responsible for abiding by the laws. It means in any circumstances, a person has some behaviors to cause environmental degradation, such as littering waste, authorities will have some strict punishments, which provides fresh air in the residential areas. Second, in order to implementing resonated influences, the importance of firms is significant. In fact, by concentrating on producing eco-friendly products and building waste disposal treatment, companies contribute to green effects to the environment.
On the other hand, there are a whole host of reasons why individuals play a key role in this activity. First, in order to raise the awareness of residents, people can give their hands to prevent environment from harmful behaviors. For example, they can participate in voluntary projects and encourage people to save electricity in their neighborhood, which can be conducive to our natural resources. Second, if each person pays more attention to the severe threats to the nature, they can adjust their bad habits in daily life. This means they can consume less, recycle more and practice zero-waste lifestyle, thereby making our environment a sustainable development.
In conclusion, the role of residents in protecting the environment is far more significant than authorities. By taking part in the environment campaigns, such as Global Hours, individuals take steps to raise awareness to make our environment become a worth-living place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | subodh | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | kingdangyeu0606 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Maleeha | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | dknk | 78 | view |
- The charts shows air pollution levels by different causes among four countries in 2012 82
- The graphs below show the post-school qualifications held by Australians in the age groups 25 to 34 and 55 to 69. 84
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000. 84
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days. 61
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In recent decades, the question of wheth...
^^^
Line 2, column 20, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
In recent decades, the question of whether government should take responsibility f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 38, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
.... On the other hand, there are a whole host of reasons why individuals play a key r...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ironment become a worth-living place.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72909698997 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45156335021 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602006688963 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4639800016 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.357142857 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25187852842 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075371427444 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475065122613 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127948851865 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483760345035 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.