Some people believe world poverty can be solved by the governments of rich countries giving large amounts of money to the governments of poor countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is generally believed that by providing aid to poor countries, the rich countries could solve one of the most critical issues which is the world poverty. While it would partly help improve the situation, I do not agree that the poverty can be solved completely just by giving large amounts of money.
First of all, by doing so, the governments has already forgotten the fundamental, underlying causes of poverty, which are based entirely on the policies and regulations themselves. In fact, this can only be served as a temporary solution and does not necessarily bring any long-term benefits or impacts to the current poverty situation. If governments of poor countries insisted on having no reinforcements on their regulations, consequently, there would be no improvements in the economy, hunger and poverty would still remain. The government agencies themselves have to play crucial roles in improving the current situations.
Second, if governments from poor countries continuously receive financial aid from the more developed ones, it will eventually give them a sense of reliance. In other words, they might have to constantly depend on the help of other countries and cannot take control over the situation. Greece debt crisis is a famously known example in this case. Back in the days, Greece used to to carry too much debt, to the point where the government had to declare bankruptcy. As a part of the Eurozone, they are forced to seek out the help from other EU countries for several bailouts in order to pay the debt. However, Greece still remained a poor country compared to other members of the Eurozone and has not been able to recover their economy since.
In conclusion, while it might be a fairly good approach to fund poor countries to reduce poverty, it would require more efforts, especially on the poor countries side, to completely erase hunger and improve their economies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | Tran Mai Phuong | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011 Summarise the main features and make comparisons where needed 95
- Nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather than to work for a company or organisation. Why might this be the case? What could be the disadvantages of being self-employed ? 84
- The graph shows the changes in percentages of various digital devices users in one European city to browse the Internet and send emails between 2000 and 2008. Describe the trend and changes in the chart. 67
- Teenagers are spending an increasing amount of time on the internet and this is having a negative effect on their social skills Do you agree or disagree 51
- Choose three of the following media and discuss their advantages and disadvantages. Identify the most effective one:Books, Comics, TV, Film, Theatre, Radio 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...his case. Back in the days, Greece used to to carry too much debt, to the point where...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, second, so, still, while, in conclusion, in fact, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07961783439 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80834844105 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585987261146 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6803798417 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.692307692 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306353957088 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095928772421 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795823765247 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191956988306 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115533079963 0.056905535591 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.