The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010
The given graph compares the number of male and female in terms of six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010
Overall, the higher the level of education, the more male teachers dominated, and the reverse occurred with respect to female teachers.
Women dominated the teaching profession in primary school, but less so at lower and upper secondary education. It was particularly true of nursery school, where the share of female teachers was above 95%. Similarly one-sided was the situation in primary school, where over 90% of teachers were also female.
At secondary and upper upper secondary level this pattern was less pronounced, where there were nearly equal proportions of male and female teachers. On the other hand, male teachers outnumbered female teachers in high-level education, where the proportion of men was twice that for women.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | Mohlaroy Ella | view | |
| 2023-08-16 | Mohlaroy Ella | view | |
| 2023-08-09 | Ngoc Ling | view | |
| 2023-08-09 | Ngoc Ling | view | |
| 2023-08-09 | Ngoc Ling | view |
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 61
- the chart showns compenents of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000 61
- The chart below gives some of the most reported issues among people living in UK cities in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying fulltime or part time 73
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education inBritain in three periods and whether they were studying fulltime or part-time.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, andmake comparisons where releva 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...share of female teachers was above 95%. Similarly one-sided was the situation in primary ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 18, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: upper
...ers were also female. At secondary and upper upper secondary level this pattern was less p...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, similarly, so, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 730.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 139.0 196.424390244 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25179856115 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43363162301 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65491995528 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575539568345 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8004229127 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.666666667 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.23603664747 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252923103452 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121515586906 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136528813429 0.0843802449381 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194731027389 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.165027340814 0.0819641961636 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.