The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons
The graph compares the results of teams A, B and C in terms of four different seasons from 2002 to 2005. It is measured by points.
Overall, it can be seen that there was a significant fluctuation about the scores between three groups. But the team B had the highest score over the period 3 years.
At the beginning of the period, in 2002, the score of team A reached the highest points of nearly 85 points. The figures for team C was 10 points, at least twice as high as those for team C at the same time. There were a dramatic increase in the points of both A and C team, accounted for 11 and 15 points respectively, while team B dropped by around 22 points in 2003.
In 2004, there biggest change was seen in the score of A team that team A reached a peak at 34 points before hitting a free fall to 8 points in 2005. The points of B team was 43 points by 2004, after going up to 55 points at the end of the period. This figures for team C rose in both the period of 2004 and 2005, with 12 points and 5 points respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view |
- the chart showns compenents of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000 61
- The bar chart below shows the distribution of different income groups of men aged 25 44 in Sydney according to whether they were born in Australia or overseas 88
- The table below shows the amount of waste production (in millions of tonnes) in six different countries over a twenty-year period 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ps. But the team B had the highest score over the period 3 years. At the beginni...
^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'there the biggest'.
Suggestion: there the biggest
...y around 22 points in 2003. In 2004, there biggest change was seen in the score of A team ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.02926829268 4.92477711251 82% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29312917297 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517073170732 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4998630134 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201777480099 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997808462716 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795495698446 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152609599799 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545117259855 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 13.2329268293 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 93.48 61.2550243902 153% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 6.09 11.4140731707 53% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.32 8.06136585366 78% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.