Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many developed countries with vast reserves of money have been providing financial aids to the underdeveloped countries. Despite pouring huge amount of funds in these countries, it has not resolved poverty. Thus, it has been argued that these nations should provide other means to help the poor countries to grow. I completely agree with this point of view.
There are many reasons why giving funds to third-world countries does not eradicate the poverty. To begin with, corruption is one of the major factors. For example, Pakistan has been given billions of dollars through the US-Aid program to improve its economic status, but this donation never reached the poor class due to its corrupt leadership, which is responsible for distributing this fund. Additionally, bad economic policies by the governments are also responsible for the improper utilization of these monetary funds. If the governments had spent this money wisely on their people, they would have created a self-sustaining system of economic development.
However, there are many other ways in which rich nations can help third-world countries to fight with the poverty. Firstly, they can set up industries in underdeveloped countries, which will help both nations. It will not only provide job opportunities but also bring foreign reserve in the host nations. Secondly, developed countries should give educational incentives to the youth of poorer nations. This will produce more number of educated people, which will be able to make financial contributions for their countries. Therefore, these strategies can help poorer nations to alleviate their economic conditions by themselves.
In conclusion, I totally agree with the idea that instead of giving funds to poor countries, rich nations should think of other ways of helping them out such as developing industry and educating their young generation. This will have far greater effects on their economy than donating money.
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged. Others believe that children who are taught to co-operate rather than compete become more useful adults. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45874587459 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8651959213 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567656765677 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.0315201212 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2941176471 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8235294118 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282682858652 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094154577651 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087778555157 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182010169395 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579383653149 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.