Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued by a significant number of individuals that the university curriculum should not include academic subjects instead focus on practical learnings during the complete course. I completely agree with this approach and believe that practical knowledge is more easy to understand and their demands in the professional world are high.
To begin with, colleges should pay more attention to practical training rather than paper studies because practical skills are necessary to acquire jobs in the market. Training is essential in a professional field as compared with grades, as these skills are required in daily duties at the workplace. For instance, many industries spend billions of dollar on newly appointed staff to guide them professional skills which are must in their work schedule. Therefore taking such training at college duration can boost the career of a learner.
Similarly, practical training is easy to understand as compared with theoretical books and help every child to understand the logic behind subjects. Workshops and training are inevitable effective tools of learning, therefore universities must incorporate more practical training instead of the theory part. A survey conducted by the education department has revealed that students taking part in projects help them to understand their subjects easily and makes them more confident to work on a professional scale.
On the other hand, reading theoretical subjects require more patience and concentration in studies, which many students fail to comply and lose the opportunity to learn, therefore incorporating more practical studies can improve the ways of acquiring knowledge in the university education system.
To conclude, I agree because hands-on training makes studies easier and the requirement of these skills in the professional world is evident. It is to believe that in future, the education system will have less theoretical studies and more or completely replaced with a practical education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-20 | bhatvishal@ | 82 | view |
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 61
- More and more people are suffering from health problems caused by a modern life style which cannot be treated with modern medicines. Some people think that a return to traditional medicines should be encouraged. To what extent do you agree? 61
- Discipline is an ever increasing problem in modern school. Some people think that discipline should be the responsibility of teachers, while others think that this is the role of parents.Discuss both the views and give your opinion. 73
- Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Air transport is increasingly used to export fruit and vegetables to countries where they cannot be grown or are out of season.What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... which are must in their work schedule. Therefore taking such training at college duratio...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 165, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...world is evident. It is to believe that in future, the education system will have less th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, therefore, for instance, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60396039604 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94221414555 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524752475248 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.3898376613 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.5 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208303183118 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827885117338 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439132309261 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12619245339 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022499159712 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.