A nation should require all of his students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The statement is a bit too strong: it is not necessarily wrong to want that students don't choose right away their career, but there are too many variables to pretend that everyone follows this rule, so it's impossible to accept it as it is. In fact, I quite disagree with this recommendation, and I think that in many cases it would be better to let students choose their future.
First of all, many children show their talents and their interests even when they're young. If they have to follow a strict national curriculum for years, they won't enjoy what they like most. Let's take as example Mozart: he was one of the most gifted musicians of the history, and since young age he was very skilled. If he had to attend a school in which music is not so important, then he wouldn't have had the opportunity to express himself and be so prolificuos.
Another problem is that there are some children that have disabilities; this sometimes can lead them to difficulties in following the pace of the rest of the class. During highschool there were a few of students who had this problem, and they all had someone to assist them and the school provided a different program. In this way they could give their best, without feeling that everyone was bettere than them. One of this guys was even able to get in the first twenty students of a school physics test!
Of course there are some reasons to want to impose a standard curriculum, and probably the most important one is that often children (and their parents, too) aren't wise enough to understand what is the best thing for the child, and may follow the wrong way. If the State gives them the right indications, many young students will eventually thank it for not allowing them to attend the wrong classes.
Moreover, the program can be changed over the years, influenced by the change of market. In fact, the governent knows better than anyone else what are the sectors that one day will be needed and thus will be the ones in which there will be more hirings, so the program will prepare the students so that there will be an increase of children who will attend the courses relative to that sector. For example in these days one of the most requested job is the engineer. The government could increase the amount of math and physics taught at school so that once the students go to college they will surely have enough knowledge to give their best at engineering courses.
But there is another factor to consider. A national curriculum can't cover all different branches of knowledge in a satisfying way. This means that some students, once starting the colledge, may not have the right background to do well, and this won't be their fault. How could they do well if nobody ever teached them the basics of that argument? It's like when someone who went for a more humanitarian highschool wants to attend a scientific faculty at university. Of course some of them may make it and get the degree, but there's plenty of them who struggle and in the end surrender and end their studies without success.
In the end, it is true that having a common program for the students has some advantages, but it is obvious that not all students can fit in the same curriculum, so the government should allow different students to follow different programs, giving some guidance to the families to choose the best option.
- Argument Topic: "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen 42
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su 58
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su 50
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...necessarily wrong to want that students dont choose right away their career, but the...
^^^^
Line 2, column 78, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...r talents and their interests even when theyre young. If they have to follow a strict ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 191, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...s, they wont enjoy what they like most. Lets take as example Mozart: he was one of t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 390, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...hich music is not so important, then he wouldnt have had the opportunity to express him...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... everyone was bettere than them. One of this guys was even able to get in the first ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 157, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...t often children and their parents, too arent wise enough to understand what is the b...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 63, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ctor to consider. A national curriculum cant cover all different branches of knowled...
^^^^
Line 6, column 110, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a satisfying way" with adverb for "satisfying"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ver all different branches of knowledge in a satisfying way. This means that some students, once st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 523, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...hem may make it and get the degree, but theres plenty of them who struggle and in the ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, well, for example, i think, in fact, of course, first of all, in many cases, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 65.0 33.0505617978 197% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2759.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 596.0 442.535393258 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62919463087 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94096258147 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45082888109 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.444630872483 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 836.1 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.77640449438 563% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.8970929042 60.3974514979 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.409090909 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 23.4991977007 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 5.21951772744 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122757512526 0.243740707755 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389698977084 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413967463397 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0671029940932 0.150359130593 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267099327448 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 48.8420337079 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.