Tv effects on children
There is no doubt that TV programs are nowadays being increasingly watched by awide range of people in all ages.But the question:should our children be encouraged to watch it ? Remains a controversial issue with many different opinions regarding it.
On one side of the argument, there are some people who believe that the detrimental effect of the TV exceeds the beneficial one.One good reason for the
Adopting this outlook is that there is no guarantee that the bad behaviors involved in some of the programs will not passively pass to their children.Another illustration is the huge amount of time wasted as well as study distraction.
On the other hand, others do assume that the interesting way of presenting precious information having attractive colors and sound effects is way better than the traditional manners.They are convinced that the firstly mentioned tool if received by the young appropriately it would make them absorb it easier and in no time
Personally, I stand in the middle between the two opinions.My firm conviction is that the mind taking route of wrapping tough information with fun has to be encouraged strongly.However, there must be a huge effort exerted from both parents and teachers to select the good content and for the strict time control .
To close, watchingTV in the right quantity of time with a responsible supervision is a desirable strategy that better to be adopted in both home and school as atrial to broaden our kids horizons effortlessly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-23 | Salmaelkhateeb | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...ed by awide range of people in all ages.But the question:should our children be enc...
^^^
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...it ? Remains a controversial issue with many different opinions regarding it. On one side o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: One
...ct of the TV exceeds the beneficial one.One good reason for the Adopting this ou...
^^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ntee that the bad behaviors involved in some of the programs will not passively pass to the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Another
...ll not passively pass to their children.Another illustration is the huge amount of time...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 183, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: They
...way better than the traditional manners.They are convinced that the firstly mentione...
^^^^
Line 9, column 60, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: My
... in the middle between the two opinions.My firm conviction is that the mind taking...
^^
Line 9, column 178, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
... with fun has to be encouraged strongly.However, there must be a huge effort exerted fr...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 312, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... content and for the strict time control . To close, watchingTV in the right qu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, regarding, so, well, as to, no doubt, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1257.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15163934426 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10834231107 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635245901639 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 16.0721442886 31% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 48.0 20.2975951904 236% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 199.306196592 49.4020404114 403% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 251.4 106.682146367 236% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 48.8 20.7667163134 235% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 21.4 7.06120827912 303% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158742981211 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735758756277 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778450426423 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0683120289732 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061530886925 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 27.2 13.0946893788 208% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 22.76 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.0 11.3001002004 195% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.48 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 21.2 10.1190380762 210% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 22.0 10.7795591182 204% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.