One of consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing.
Do you think the advantages of the development outweigh the disadvantages
Improved health care facilities have decreased the mortal rate and made people's living longer. In my opinion, the health care facilities are aiding people in living longer life and advantages have outweighed the disadvantages.
Firstly, the main con of the increased people's long life is the rise in the population. It has estimated that death rate has reduced in past century from 50% to 20% due to the improved medicine. This has created the imbalance between the youth and older people in the society. For instance, 25% population in Japan have crossed the age of >65 years. In Japan, this has risen the expenditure for caring older people in the country. Another problem is reduction in income due to less working strength in the country.
On the other hand, the growing scientific world is creating the vast opportunities for the people in terms of health care and increasing life sentence. Firstly, varied choices of vaccinations and antibiotics are helping people in curing diseases and declining suffering of people.The hundreds of medicines at market and thousands of them at pipeline have also made managing future epidemic worth the money. Secondly, research has enabled exchanging and replacing the vital organs very easy going if necessary which has risen the people's chance of survival. Thus, improving medical facilities in country give people oppurtunity of better life and standard. The suffering and endurance caused by the diseases may decrease which further strengthen the community.
In conclusion, healthy society is route for economic, scientific and social prosperity of the country. The advantages is for more importance in terms of humanity and growth than the disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-23 | sashwini50 | 78 | view |
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The diagram below shows geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.Summarise 61
- The map illustrates how Meadowside village and Fonton, which is neighboring town has developed over three year periods. 73
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three conditions 73
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 516, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o less working strength in the country. On the other hand, the growing scientifi...
^^^
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...eases and declining suffering of people.The hundreds of medicines at market and tho...
^^^
Line 4, column 119, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...osperity of the country. The advantages is for more importance in terms of humanit...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32222222222 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79542296885 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57037037037 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3943940405 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218360518213 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738703119712 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827451353092 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133353342751 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.099419277576 0.056905535591 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.