Environmental problems are too big for individual countries and individual persons to address. On other words, we have reached a stage where the only way to protect the environment is at an international level. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Industrial Revolution and human involvement in various aspects of daily life harmfully affect our ecosystem, which in turn result in a heavy disturbance in the biodiversity. Some people suggest that many countries should join to tackle several environmental issues, particularly the most serious one which is "Global Warming". Other believe that individuals' participation at a national level is a must. This will be analyzed in this essay before a conclusion is drawn.
On the one hand, international co-operation brings about several merits in limiting many ecological problems. The 2015 United nations Climate Change Conference which was held in Paris on November 2015 set a good example. Fifty-Five nations have attended this scientific meeting in order to reach an agreement on the reduction of climate change by an attempt to decrease the global average temperature below "2º C" compared to industrial sites. There is a positive correlation between the world's unity and the decline in greenhouse gases emission, which are considered the main contributors to rising the temperature of the Earth planet. Hence, problems concerning our environment could not be solved without human intervention at a universal level.
In addition to this, local citizens and authorities should stand as one hand to save our planet in many ways. The government should reduce people's dependence on fossil fuel for energy production, rather encourage the reliance on renewable source of energy such as solar power and biodiesel. A further point in favor of this, residents themselves should be motivated to use energy-efficient devices such as LED bulbs which save a huge amount of electricity compared to traditional bulbs. Once people realize that their electricity bill will be reduced, they will be ready for the initial heavy investment. Overall, changing people's lifestyle can enhance for a better life.
After analyzing the several approaches to live in a less polluted world, it becomes obvious that amalgamation at national and international levels are tremendously significant. It is hoped that these practices put into action in the near future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-23 | GT Eltaher | 89 | view |
- Environmental problems are too big for individual countries and individual persons to address. On other words, we have reached a stage where the only way to protect the environment is at an international level. To what extent do you agree or disagree with 89
- Environmental problems such as pollution and climatic variations are increasing nowadays The governments have taken some measures at a global level But they get only a few solutions Why is it so How can this problem be solved 95
- Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions. Others believe it is the only way to save these traditions. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 78
- Now, a lot of people are doing an academic study. We should encourage them to learn vocational skills (like plumbers and electricians). Do you agree or disagree? 78
- In some countries fast food restaurants and supermarkets give money to schools to promote their products do you think this is a positive or negative development 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...lobal Warming'. Other believe that individuals participation at a national level is a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 499, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...e is a positive correlation between the worlds unity and the decline in greenhouse gas...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...man intervention at a universal level. In addition to this, local citizens and ...
^^^
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ces put into action in the near future.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53915662651 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09050088931 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644578313253 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8027735141 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.9375 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 7.06120827912 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105036714526 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0347363289332 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493354615193 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0622633411402 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252941971504 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.