Some people are fond of buying new gadgets, phones, or laptops.
Is it a good thing or bad thing?
Discuss your opinion.
The fond of purchasing new gadgets is a person, what drug is to addict. Nowadays international companies accommodate the demand of all people who buy the latest version of all sorts of electronic gadgets. At issue weather is this fondness l to buy why all this electronic gadgets is limiting or liberating. To achieve a clear picture, it is imperative to put this manager of affection in comparative and also broader context.
On the one hand it is namely believed that this affection leads people to use technology more. Lured by new and tempting features such as better camera for a cellphone,people might use those gadgets to improve the life, and subsequently live a much more convenient life. Set against this view is the view that in most occasion those options are not necessary. For example the super zoom of a camera which can magnify 50 times on a giant screen. The pertinent question is that in which situation necessitates using that. It is obvious that the giving reasons for the fondness are pretext.
Another way of looking at this affection to buy is that this attitude is a blatant instant of consumerism. Manipulated by enchanting Commercials, people all taking this bait to buy the new electronic devices, including phones and laptops which are most of the time luxurious item rather than beneficial one. This scale of advertisements, which is unprecedented,are tempting people to put substantial amount of their budget on purchasing new-brand phones and laptops .Versatile, light and compact, better quality, and modernized futures, are some advertising trap to faster these sort of fondness for buying companies' productions. The contracting view you holds that the use of those gadgets can make life much easier than it used to be;however, next to their prices ,which are astronomy night, is not logical to buy them. This should be added that, people by adopting this approach are just struggling to mitigate their insatiable appetite ,which the more they buy, the bigger it gets.
On balance the mindset is that this fondness of buying new gadgets do more harm that good. Indeed, this is vividly clear that this affection for purchasing stems from consumerism and companies' advertisement, rather than thoughtful choices. We should not lose sight of the fact that the value of advantages of new-brand gadgets and phones pales in comparison to their prices. As a result, if the fond of purchasing new gadgets and phone laptops is like drug ,this affection needs regulation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-01 | ruhollah1998 | 61 | view |
- Some people think that protecting the environment is the government's responsibility. Other believe that every individual should take responsibility for it.Discuss both view and give your opinion. 73
- Some people are fond of buying new gadgets, phones, or laptops. Is it a good thing or bad thing?Discuss your opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , people
...es such as better camera for a cellphone,people might use those gadgets to improve the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , are
...f advertisements, which is unprecedented,are tempting people to put substantial amou...
^^^^
Line 5, column 466, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... purchasing new-brand phones and laptops .Versatile, light and compact, better qua...
^^
Line 5, column 468, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Versatile
...urchasing new-brand phones and laptops .Versatile, light and compact, better quality, and...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 574, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this sort' or 'these nulls'?
Suggestion: this sort; these nulls
...es, are some advertising trap to faster these sort of fondness for buying companies produc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 766, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...used to be;however, next to their prices ,which are astronomy night, is not logica...
^^
Line 5, column 940, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ng to mitigate their insatiable appetite ,which the more they buy, the bigger it ...
^^
Line 5, column 966, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iable appetite ,which the more they buy, the bigger it gets. On balance the min...
^^
Line 7, column 457, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...w gadgets and phone laptops is like drug ,this affection needs regulation.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, for example, sort of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 44.0 24.0651302605 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2088.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 412.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06796116505 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89128410112 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519417475728 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 640.8 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.725039409 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.894736842 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6842105263 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73684210526 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14279857787 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522558541287 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045598826887 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975143520552 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026316945295 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.