some people think that it is good to lay out for leisure time activities other think that there is no need for any outlining
The discussion on some people think that it is good to lay out for leisure time activities other think that there is no need for any outlining is a debatable topic and people around the globe are divided in their argument. The subject attract majority of view from people and remain a hot topic among people of concern. In this essay, I shall scrutinize both points of view by providing some relevant example and explanation before drawing any convclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this arguemnt but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that some people think that more need of leisure time activities which is more good because one person do work all day this for leisure time is more important in human life. Another pivotal aspect of this arguemnst is that 2016 in one people full day in 2 hour rest with this he do more work in full day. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that leisure time is not good in human life because they are full interest in work but when they are free time in not interest in work. Besides, 70% people do not like leisure time. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-05 | Jaskaransingh11 | 55 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...le full day in 2 hour rest with this he do more work in full day. Needless to say,...
^^
Line 9, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e because they are full interest in work but when they are free time in not inter...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1114.0 1207.87684729 92% => OK
No of words: 242.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60330578512 5.00649968141 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25062126675 2.71678728327 83% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 139.433497537 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528925619835 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 352.8 379.143842365 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.4173419028 50.4703680194 189% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.777777778 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8888888889 20.9669160288 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.25397266985 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405155761001 0.242375264174 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160034906943 0.0925447433944 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.224489036616 0.071462118173 314% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283253477877 0.151781067708 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.179461137934 0.0609392437508 294% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.1260098522 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.5310837438 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.32886699507 91% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 55.0591133005 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.