Medical technology is responsible for the human's life expectancy. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
The importance medical technology responsible for human life expectancy which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial for while other reject this notion. This essay will further elaborate both aspects for this trend and this will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reason which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stem from the fact that medical technology is beneficial to human life therefore with the help of medical technology people live long life. For instance, people can have faith upon medical treatment as well as medical technology available in everywhere. Another pivotal aspect for the argument is that serious patients can escape from any disease as well as very useful in emergency cases. Needless to say, that all these merits of medical technology responsible for human life expectancy in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate this argument and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but the most alarming is that old peoples never die as well as medical treatments are very expensive for poor people they cannot afford that therefore some people think medical technology is curse for our society. It is apparent why many are against medical technology responsible for human life expectancy.
According to the argument aforementioned above, one can reach a conclusion that the benefits of medical technology responsible for human life expectancy are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless the potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-12 | kuldeep sharma | 100 | view |
| 2019-10-14 | Jaskaransingh11 | 80 | view |
| 2019-02-22 | Ahmed145 | 80 | view |
| 2019-02-22 | Ahmed145 | 80 | view |
| 2018-01-31 | Snoob | 55 | view |
- There are social , medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. Do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of mobile phones? 77
- Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world. Ordinary people can get no advantage with the development of air travel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 70
- polygamy has increased widely in recent years what solution can you brought forward to decrease this issue. 77
- How to control the rapidly growing population in the cities and the necessary measures to the taken to control it. 77
- Fresh water resources diminish in large cities in the world each year, What is the cause of this crucial problem? What is the solution? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...ife expectancy are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless the potential drawbacks should not be o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 31.9359605911 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45238095238 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77511209963 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 447.3 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.9139537252 50.4703680194 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.4 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.25397266985 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316713619157 0.242375264174 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164020857816 0.0925447433944 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119000622393 0.071462118173 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218081579906 0.151781067708 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427877456414 0.0609392437508 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.