People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.
It is said the most popular ideas are also criticized by their advocates who are deeply committed to them. I agree with the statement to some extent.
On the one hand, when people are the most deeply committed to and idea or policy, they try to do more research about that and gather more information. Therefore, they find more points or weaknesses about the idea or policy and attempt to criticize them in order to amend them. In other words, the most popular ideas or policies are criticized by their advocates for more improvement. To be committed to an idea or policy helps the better and strong development of that idea or policy. some leaders such as Imam Khomeini in Iran who was the leader of people in the revolution of Iran tried to improve many rules. He was a big fan of Islamic rules but he attempted to update and correct them based on the needs of people and new conditions in the country. Conditions always change, and everything should be amended and improved.
On the other hand, many ideas or policies are criticized by their opponents. For example, researches about space or rockets. We can see that most opponents believe that spending money on such scientific researches is waste of money and instead the budget should be spent on the renovation of public places which are more useful and applicable for people. If the scientists or advocates of these research projects wanted to give up on such objections, there would not be any spacecraft or satellite built. Most of the time ideas or policies are reviewed by the opponents in order to reject them. By contrast, advocates try to find weaknesses or develop them for more progress.
To summarize, in my view policies and ideas are equally criticized by both advocates and opponents but the main aim of each group to check them is different.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | Himanshu Sharma | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | Himanshu Sharma | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | Himanshu Sharma | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | jha | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | NobodyUp | 66 | view |
- Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate. 50
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the manager of WWAC radio station."To reverse a decline in listener numbers, our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock-music format. The decline has occurred despite population gro 63
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small-business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe."Jazz music is extremely popular in the city of Monroe: over 100,000 people attended Monroe's annual jazz festival las 63
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation’s cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 50
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 486, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...ong development of that idea or policy. some leaders such as Imam Khomeini in Iran w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, for example, such as, in my view, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 317.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75078864353 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59754614342 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492113564669 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.7728341241 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.125 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357448856987 0.243740707755 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120686674291 0.0831039109588 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126783741244 0.0758088955206 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233878752493 0.150359130593 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111389350672 0.0667264976115 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 100.480337079 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.