Artificial Intelligence will soon replace teachers in the classroom. Do you agree wit this statement? What is an alternative to traditional face-to-face teaching.
The idea that classroom tutors will in the nearest future be replaced by artificially intelligent machines, is ridiculous and unfounded at its best. This is because teaching as a profession requires not only intellectual prowess but emotional connection between teachers and students and machines lack this attribute. Instead, online education is a better substitute to conventional face-to-face learning.
Artificial intelligence lacks emotions and therefore will not be able to replace human instructors in the classroom. For effective impartation of knowledge, the giver and receiver must be able to connect emotionally.Machines would not be able to decipher if the students are following the course of teaching or when they are sick and unable to learn. Humans alone have the gift of empathy and this is needed to creat a conducive atmosphere for learning. For example a resent pilot study of machine delivered lectures at a local college in Benin, Nigeria saw the failure rate of students rise to 90% as against 15% with regular teachers. Most of the students complained of not been able to connect with the machines emotionally.
Rather than machines, online courses is a better substitute to face-to-face teaching as humans are still involved in this process even though they are not physically present with the students. Teachers record and post videos of their teachings for students to watch and listen to with instructions for tests and assignments. Students can give feedback to their tutors who can share their concerns and burdens, which machines are incapable of.
To conclude, replacing teachers with artificial intelligence in classrooms is completely impossible as these machines lack the ability to connect with students which is paramount for effective learning. Online classes is a better alternative instead as humans are involved in this process as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-13 | Preciousdede | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Preciousdede | 73 | view |
- why do we needto attend university. 67
- In some areas of the US, a "curfew" is imposed in which teenagers are not allowed to be out of doors after a particular time at night unless they are accompanied by an adult. What is your opinion about this. 73
- Artificial Intelligence will soon replace teachers in the classroom. Do you agree wit this statement? What is an alternative to traditional face-to-face teaching. 73
- In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities, some people think new teachers and doctors should work in rural areas for a few years, but others think everyone should be free to choose where they work. discuss both vi 73
- Some people think that University students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both views and give yo 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Machines
...ver must be able to connect emotionally.Machines would not be able to decipher if the st...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s are involved in this process as well.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, still, therefore, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46075085324 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06041547486 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546075085324 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1838364102 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.076923077 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38461538462 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179207758954 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735232131048 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656923352216 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134318405563 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685617669524 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.