University education should be restricted to the very best academic students, rather than being available to a large proportion of young people.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
To survive the rapidly changing environment of the modern 21st century, it is vital to have a university degree. Despite this, some people point out that rather than being available to a larger proportion of people, education should be limited to the academically talented students. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with the notion and in this essay, I will support my views with examples.
There are many reasons why I disagree with restricting the number of people seeking university education. Firstly, everyone has the right to access higher education. Discrimination for students who had a bad academic performance wouldn’t help them realize their full potential. Moreover, the contemporary competitive environment strongly demands people to get a higher education degree to acquire professional specialization. A degree helps people land on a stable job with good pay and promotes job satisfaction. Additionally, having high and stable employment generates more GDP in a country. Without many graduates, the country faces a risk in the loss of a skilled workforce, and the loss of creativity so that the economic development of a country would slow down.
On the other hand, some assert that education should be limited to the very best preforming individuals. They feel that if tertiary education is accessed by all, the quality would deteriorate whilst the quantity would increase rapidly. Companies would only hire the very best graduates, leaving the remaining surplus unemployed. By contrast, for example, making education accessible by all would help a secondary sector economy transition into a tertiary sector economy, as education helps develop and produce new jobs in the country.
In conclusion, from my point of view, university education should be accessible by everyone. Not only does it make an individual skillful, it also helps develop and raise the living standards of the economy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-17 | viethung123 | 89 | view |
| 2021-05-04 | mehrdadsol | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | yazhtut | 78 | view |
| 2015-05-01 | arizkis | 90 | view |
- Some people regard video games as harmless fun, or even as a useful educational tool. Others, however, believe that video games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them. In your opinion, do the drawbacks of video games outweigh the benefit 78
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems. as well as practical problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement> 73
- The diagram below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 21
- With the rise of e-books comes the decline in paper books. Some people see this as a step forward while others do not. What are the advantages and disadvantages of the trend? 78
- The diagram below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, so, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46153846154 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0431658482 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.121211928 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0625 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6875 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226104145413 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686305560392 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100302680341 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138004346401 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767309766265 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.