Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
In the present era of innovation, research and employment involves a significant amount of interdisciplinary work. The prompt recommends that universities should need every student to build up their interdisciplinary skills and their interests outside their major by taking up a variety of courses. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the claim and argue that interdisciplinary studies help the student in varied ways for two important reasons.
To begin, several jobs require interdisciplinary skills for better understanding and functioning of their job. To illustrate this, let us consider an example in the blooming job arena of autonomous vehicles. A typical self-driving car requires sensors to detect roads and obstacles, computer chip to control the movement of the vehicle and a mechanical engineering component for improving the efficiency of engine. The field of autonomous vehicles includes electrical, mechanical and computer engineering knowledge. If a student does not have sufficient basic knowledge in these fields, it will be difficult for him to understand the working of the whole product and it will drastically reduce his job prospects. These interdisciplinary skills can be acquired by taking up courses outside one’s major and thus, proving my point of view.
Furthermore, interdisciplinary studies allows a student to explore various fields outside his major. For instance, a computer science student having no idea on the functioning of law, can take up an introductory course in his or her university to get a basic knowledge and skills in the field of law. There are few courses which will be helpful in a student’s future such as banking, investments and music. Exploring courses outside one’s major also allows one to improve on their avocations such as art and music. The benefits of exploring courses outside one’s major are profound and makes one to develop passion in a new field. Thus, this proves my point of view.
Ofcourse, some argue that universities mandating students to take up courses outside their major will result in them losing interest in their major. However, if they are losing interest in their major probably their major is not their passion and this step by universities allows one to find their passion and niche. In conclusion, I reiterate the aforementioned examples that strongly suggest that universities should require every student to take up courses outside his/her major.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | sunpeach | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | Daffodilia | 83 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Gaurav Singla | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | loquats | 66 | view |
- University should require every student to take a variety of courses outside of the student's field of study.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, b 58
- The following is an excerpt from a letter sent by the principal of Greenwood School to the parents of all incoming kindergartners."We have decided to institute a policy of all-day kindergarten, instead of half-day kindergarten, for all students at Gr 55
- "The following opinion was provided in a letter to the editor of a national aeronautics magazine: “Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a 75
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve. 50
- The regional brand manager sent the following memo to the national brand manager for Sun-Beem Facial Cleanser.“We need to institute a huge publicity campaign for the launch of Sun-Beem’s improved formula. Without an enormous media blitz, including tel 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 447, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... varied ways for two important reasons. To begin, several jobs require interdisc...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, of course, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2090.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 384.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44270833333 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20773190893 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505208333333 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3587176363 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.111111111 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219582629284 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784961878589 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623320505795 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146354259833 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291456929127 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.