Increasing price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
Traffic and pollution problem is increasing day by day, which require some effective measures. While it can be somewhat effective in reducing traffic and pollution problems, however, it is not the most effective measure we have at our disposal. It can be thought of as a supporting measure along with other measures.
If the price of petrol is increased, people will have less interest in using vehicles run by petrol, which can be understood. But it won't have any significant effect in reducing traffic and pollution problem, because other factors also contribute to these problems. People who are used to driving a car everyday which is run by petrol won't be easily motivated in reducing their usage if the petrol price is increased in a small amount. Again, the number of vehicles are not responsible alone. Road conditions, traffic systems and personals responsible for these also have to be kept in mind.
Petrol is also used in power generation, where power companies sometimes receive large amount of subsidies from the government. So an increase in the price of petrol won't have any significant effect in the use of petrol in power generation. As a result, pollution won't be reduced as much as expected.
An effective approach could be introduction of alternative fuels, which are more friendly to the nature. More research in this regard should be encouraged. There are already some environment friendly fuels like solar power, wind power, hydroelectric power and so on. As for improving traffic conditions, people should be encouraged to use public transports like buses, trains, trams etc rather than private cars and motorcycles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-07 | kingdangyeu0606 | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | qqwqe | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | happyhappy | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | luvite | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | luvite | 84 | view |
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 82
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the samepark today. 67
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 67
- Governments should spend money in railways rather than roads. 56
- The plans below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tive measure we have at our disposal. It can be thought of as a supporting measur...
^^
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...s. People who are used to driving a car everyday which is run by petrol wont be easily m...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, as for, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1828358209 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82275811129 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544776119403 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4392950292 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204069139491 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715851761001 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666227529953 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131299312476 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683564928207 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.