summarize the points made in the lecture about the writer of a manuscript, being sure to explain how they cast doubt to the theories made in the passage about the true writer of Voynich book.
The reading talks about the possible theories which can explain the elaborately written Voynich manuscript original writer. It presents three speculated probabilities about this book's author. However, the professor in the lecture totally questions these suggestions and refutes each of the mentioned reasons which attribute the manuscript to one person.
First, the article states that the manuscript may have been a genuine artifact about a serious scientific or magical subject written by famous author Anthony Bishop. But, professor disagrees with this statement, since he believes that Anthony Bishop's work mostly concentrated on simple subjects and he widely wrote about common topics rather than dealing with complex manuscripts like this book.
Second, the passage requested that the writing may be a fake product which contains no logical meaning behind its sophisticated mysterious codes. In contrary, the professor illustrates that this guess can not be true, because the people who lived at that time period can be fooled in so much easier ways. So, there was no need for Edward Kelly, the supossed writer, to put so much effort into something like this book to trick folks.
Third, the reading proposes that Wilfred Voynich could have written the whole manuscript himself as an antique expert. On the other hand, lecturer insists that this idea is problematic according to recent findings. He mentions that newly discovered information suggests that the ink and pages of the manuscript are about 400 years old which goes far before Voynich living time. Also, even if he provided the pages, he could never be able to use a 400 years old ink in his work.
- summarize the points made in the lecture about Edmontosaurs migration, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the passage about possible reasons for Edmontosaurs migration. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement that all of the endangered animals should be saved? compare the idea mentioned in a passage with the lecture you listened to. 75
- Some people learn best when a classroom lesson is presented in an entertaining enjoyable way Other people learn best when a lesson is presented in a serious formal way Which of these two ways of learning do you prefer Give reasons to support your answer 90
- TOEFL T P O 23 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- do you agree or disagree with this statement.it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29213483146 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54731764181 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677902621723 0.540411800872 125% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5144007319 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.75 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216277395587 0.272083759551 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780661390295 0.0996497079465 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596002689362 0.0662205650399 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129217690696 0.162205337803 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613051421842 0.0443174109184 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.