The table chart shows the proportion of pupils attending four secondary schools types between between 2000 and 2009. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The tabular chart illustrates the information about the terms of percentage of school children attending for four various types of secondary schools which was in 8 years from 2000 to 2009.
In overall, voluntary controlled schools constituted a major for secondary schools attendance among students in the first given period since community schools experienced a major in major in the last year. However, all three schools except community schools showing a falling trend as well as a significant change can be noticed in all secondary schools attendance of learners over the periods.
In terms of proportion, between 2000 and 2005 the voluntary controlled schools attained a higher figure for students attendance which accounted at over a half ( 52% ) and nearly a two fifth ( 38% ) whilst it decreased at a fifth during 2009. Similarly, only 12% learners attend community schools in 2000 after this a drastic increased can be seen in the percentage of community schools attendance and reached to peak at around three fifths and less than a third from 2009 to 2005.
The chart further proves that the percentage of school pupils attending in grammar schools noticed at approximately a quarter between 2000 while it started dropping at 19% during 2005. In contrast, a declined of double can be observed in grammar schools for students attendance at 12% in the end of the period as compared with the given proportion of the first year. Lastly, a negligible disparity of 1% had experienced in pupils attendants for specialists schools were found at 12%, 11% and 10% respectively during the given periods.
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The diagram below show how a solar powered water pump works. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and, make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The line chart below shows the acid level in mouth from consuming sugars/ honey. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The two pie charts below show the percentage of industry sectors’s contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'major in'.
Suggestion: major in
...d since community schools experienced a major in major in the last year. However, all three schoo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ttendance which accounted at over a half 52% and nearly a two fifth 38% whilst...
^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ance which accounted at over a half 52% and nearly a two fifth 38% whilst it d...
^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...over a half 52% and nearly a two fifth 38% whilst it decreased at a fifth duri...
^^
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a half 52% and nearly a two fifth 38% whilst it decreased at a fifth during 20...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, lastly, second, similarly, third, well, while, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 965.302439024 139% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13409961686 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82531655683 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498084291188 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 381.6 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 24.5305931441 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 167.5 112.824112599 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.625 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 5.23603664747 215% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250681956791 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128430528897 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596021756669 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175843649306 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475102890102 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.