Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.
Why people did not want to learning from past? I think sometimes they do not remember more about their bad past experience, or they are afraid to trap and do the same thing as past event. In contrast, I personally support to learn mistakes or bad experience at past time. Hence, when people say that learning from past time does not make sense for present living, I totally disagree.
First, I think learning mistakes from past is one way to make better future. People who always learning that will not do the same thing again. They try to analyze the cause of mistakes and try to repair their own mistakes because of learning mistakes shows the good and bad habit. Thus, people can choose which habits will continue at their present living.
In addition, learning about past has essential value for today living. They can make improvement or make something new. People are never know more about their mistakes if they do not look back at the past. Hence, it is necessary to evaluate and then improve their past. If they have weaknesses at the past, they complete that to the strength. It becomes good point for living present.
Furthermore, people can make “learning from past” as a standards or criterias that they will assess and never fall down to the same hole. Those will keep in their mind to pace one step faster. They had been made improvement and assessment from mistakes so people only used those as standards living. Thus, they always mark those more over again and again. And never trap at the same bad thing as people thinking before.
In conclusion, I individually disagree when people said that nothing valuable to learn from past to their present living. Because learning from past can make people more careful to face their present lives, so they have powerful to face the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | nhatkhang111 | 78 | view |
| 2024-07-23 | Ahmad_off | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-22 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-01 | kevann | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put before the verb 'think'.
Suggestion: sometimes think
...e did not want to learning from past? I think sometimes they do not remember more about their b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...ey do not remember more about their bad past experience, or they are afraid to trap and do the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
... to learn mistakes or bad experience at past time. Hence, when people say that learning f...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 315, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...nce, when people say that learning from past time does not make sense for present living,...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 64, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a standard' or simply 'standards'?
Suggestion: a standard; standards
... make 'learning from past' as a standards or criterias that they will assess and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, if, look, so, then, thus, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82165605096 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32380222855 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468152866242 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5282364693 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.0952380952 106.682146367 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9523809524 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.80952380952 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265286625112 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100129614673 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822777407314 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175130769531 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0741112035488 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 50.2224549098 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.3001002004 57% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.08 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.54 8.58950901804 76% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 78.4519038076 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.