The chart below shows the percentage of population in three different age group in Japan.
Summarize the information by selecting and reviewing the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The presented line graph compares 3 age groups in terms of the percentages of total Japanese population they have occupied from 1960 to 2040.
Overall, it is evident that the oldest group account for the highest proportion over the period. In addition, while the figure for citizens aging from 15 and 64 are expected to increase, opposite trends are predicted for two remaining categories.
Turning into detail, about 65% of Japanese residents aged more than 65 years in 1960. Over the next 5 decades, despite fluctuations, the rate was always kept above 60%. Throughout the remainders of the period, it is anticipated to slightly decline to approximately 55%, but still remain the largest sector among 3 counterparts.
Regarding to other categories, in comparison to the youngest group, which made up 30% of entire population in 1960, the percentage for citizens aging 15 to 65 was significantly lower, with only over 5%. Nevertheless, in the next 40 years, while the former decreased remarkably, the latter considerably expanded, which made them obtain similar numbers of nearly 15% in 2000. From 2000 to 2040, both trends are projected to maintain, resulting in the final figures of 10% and over 30%, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-24 | phuong cao | 89 | view |
- It is more iimportant to learn local history rather than world history To what extent do you agree 78
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 – 2010.Summarise the main character and make comparison where relevant. 61
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football. While other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
- The chart below shows the number of jobs in tourism related industries in one UK city between 1989 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 94
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1038.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24242424242 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92094334234 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.681818181818 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6436713232 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.333333333 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0966805234795 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0381813707501 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485367452949 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636812588942 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394283375117 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.