The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The information which is illustrated by the chart is about the amount of visitors who were going to England in Brighton attractions. Overall, it is seen from the graph that there are four tourism attractions where have a fluctuated data in every years.
Base on the graph, art gallery there in quit low percentage it was above two-fifth in 1980 then increased significantly in 1985 until slight under 40% after that was reducing, even lower than the first position, until 2010 always decreased with number less than a tenth. While that, pavilion at the first year, little above art gallery at that time, then it was booming in 1995 reached near a half, but fell dramatically in 2000 until around a third then always experienced little went down and got amount 30%
Pier in 1980 as the smallest number at that year just 10% the experienced a rise and down in every years therefore in the last year got about two-fifth as the best percentage of it. Finally, festival as the highest visitor in 1980 with number 30% but has a little change in 2010 where it was becoming the second biggest visitors after pavilion.
- in some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for government to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. 61
- In many parts of the world, children and teenagers are committing more crimes. Why is this happening? How should they by punished? 78
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030. 73
- galleries should concentrate on the history and art of their own country rather than the works of art of other parts of the world. to what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion. 73
- whether or not someone achieve their aims is mostly a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, then, therefore, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72820512821 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48305764722 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 113.673215843 43.030603864 264% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 184.4 112.824112599 163% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.0 22.9334400587 170% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4 5.23603664747 237% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0910100494515 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668948389524 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544129451408 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0828015189311 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812524667596 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 13.2329268293 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.1 10.3012195122 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.75 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.