Health spending as a percentage of GDP in 2002
The table compares the proportion of spending on healthcare in five different countries in the year 2002.
It is clear that the percentage of GDP spent on overall healthcare was highest in France and lowest in Italy. Overall, people in five given countries spent more money on public healthcare than on private healthcare.
We can see that the proportion of spending on total healthcare was highest in France, at 13% of GDP, followed by the USA, with 12.5%. By contrast, Italians spent only 9% of GDP on healthcare services, and the figures for people in Japan and Germany were slightly higher, at 10% and 11% of GDP respectively.
In the same year, France had the highest percentage of spending on public healthcare, at 8.5% of GDP, where as the USA had a higher figure for private healthcare, at 5% of GDP, than any of the other countries. On the other hand, Italians were the lowest spenders, with only 3% of GDP for private healthcare and 6% for public healthcare.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-18 | fairybear | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | Anh Nguyen 2604 | 67 | view |
| 2018-07-03 | danieltseng06 | 91 | view |
- Pie chart 11
- We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help, so we shouldonly be concerned with our own communities and countries.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- Health spending as a percentage of GDP in 2002 67
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governmentsrather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Families who send their children to private schools should not berequired to pay taxes that support the state education system.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 103, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...g on public healthcare, at 8.5% of GDP, where as the USA had a higher figure for private...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89349112426 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72655890365 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497041420118 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6021076677 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.142857143 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236544437924 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116667707305 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634065264116 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148020976413 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298434581224 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.